Toronto real estate facts and News, from Humber Bay Shore Condos, West Toronto, Etobicoke, Mississauga and Oakville. Neighbourhood Profiles, News Items, Information on Real Estate Trends, Market Statistics, Buying; Selling Tips and Commentary
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Did women cause the current recession?
Best Toronto Photo Contest
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Things to Love about TO
Monday, September 28, 2009
Increased Train Traffic thru Toronto
Dr. David McKeown took the unusual step of speaking at a protest organized by the Clean Train Coalition, repeating concerns about the health impacts of Metrolinx's proposal for the
"The trouble is the current proposal (is) built on a foundation of diesel – a mode of transportation we know is bad for air quality and not good for our health," McKeown told an energetic crowd of more than 500 gathered at Sorauren Park in Roncesvalles Village.
Here is the complete article from the Star.
Diesel Trains Through the JunctionIt's just another case of buy now, pay later. McGuinty and the pinstriped fatcats will be up north in their cottage retreats counting their profits while the rest of us stuck in the city will pay with more brutal smog alert days per year. My son Magnus already suffers from asthma, and if this goes through, we'll have to seriously consider moving away from the Junction. Multiply this by the number of other concerned parents in the area and you end up with a loss of population (read: business), decimating what is currently a thriving community."
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Canadian housing markets buck recession
Mississauga, Ontario (September 24, 2009) - With the worst of the recession over, residential real estate markets in major Canadian centres are poised for growth in the final quarter of 2009, according to a report released today by RE/MAX.
The RE/MAX Bricks and Mortar Report found the bounce back that began in early Spring has made this recession one of the shortest on record for real estate. Low interest rates, pent-up demand, and improved affordability levels have all played a role in the recovery now well-underway. Percentage increases in sales from January to August 2009 were led by Vancouver, (up a substantial 14 per cent to 23,158), Victoria (up 7.4 per cent to 5,266), Edmonton (up 6.2 per cent to 13,691), Regina (up five per cent to 2,597), Ottawa (up 2.4 per cent to 10,830) and Toronto (up 1.8 per cent to 58,421). Housing values are already ahead of record-breaking 2008 levels in seven of the 11 markets surveyed, including Newfoundland-Labrador (18.1 per cent year to $203,584), Regina (6.4 per cent to $244,088), Halifax-Dartmouth (3.5 per cent to $239,633), Winnipeg (3.5 per cent to $207,006), Ottawa (3.3 per cent to $301,684), and Toronto (up 0.3 per cent to $385,978). Nationally, average price hovers at $312,585, up 0.5 per cent over one year ago.
“Markets are heating up across the country,” says Michael Polzler, Executive Vice President, RE/MAX Ontario-Atlantic Canada. “Purchasers are clearly taking advantage of affordable prices and rock bottom interest rates. Those who missed the boat in years past have found that sitting on the sidelines can be a costly move. Prices are on the upswing and inventory levels are tightening, so the push toward homeownership is expected to continue throughout the Fall and possibly into early 2010.”
The recovery of Canada’s resale housing markets speaks to the tremendous value Canadians place on the importance of owning a home. The number of Canadians overall who own a home has increased since 1981 from 62.1 per cent to 68.4 per cent, with some markets posting even higher homeownership rates -- Calgary (74.1), St. John’s (71.5), Regina (70.1), and Edmonton (69.2). Significant gains have also been made over the same period in markets such as Ottawa -- where homeownership levels rose from 51.4 per cent to 66.7 per cent -- and Toronto, where levels rose fro m 57.3 to 67.6 per cent.
“The strength of the residential housing sector cross-country has taken many economists and housing analysts by surprise once again,” says Elton Ash, Regional Executive Vice President, RE/MAX of Western Canada. “In terms of its impact on the resale market, by historical standards, this recession was one of the mildest. The resilience of bricks and mortar has been demonstrated time and again. While there may still be some challenges down the road, the worst is definitely behind us in the housing industry.”
Over the past thirty years, the Canadian residential real estate market has experienced three major downturns – 1981, 1989, and 2008. While there have also been regional fluctuations throughout the years, return on investment over this period has been substantial, with Vancouver, Victoria, Toronto, Regina and Ottawa leading the country in terms of price appreciation.
The overall stability of real estate as an investment has also played a role. Markets like Halifax-Dartmouth, Regina, Ottawa, Winnipeg and London have provided steady returns (especially in recent years), with minimal fluctuation.
Public sentiment can best be illustrated by a recent Angus Reid Omnibus Survey* that asked the question “In which do you feel more comfortable investing your money? The stock market or real estate.” Out of 1,000 respondents from coast-to-coast, 77 per cent chose real estate. The results of the RE/MAX Bricks and Mortar Report are clearly representative of this national dynamic at work.
David Pylyp Last September there were 41% more homes for sale (27,373) than there currently are. In 2007, which was a “sellers market”, there were 25% more homes for sale (21,571) than are currently for sale. Couple that with a record month for sales coming up and “supply and demand” is bound to have the prices continue rising.
The cronic shortage of available homes for sale at the entry level of what is now 300 to 400 thousand is causing a frenzy and a perpetual bidding war on each property as it becomes available.
Hurry it May be Gone sounds so corny yet it is so true.
Serene Silence in Alderwood South Etobicoke
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Your Cottage and keeping it in the family
Ahh, your cottage – a place of sanctuary, family fun and warm memories. But passing along a cottage to the next generation can set off complex financial and family issues. Here are some suggested steps to ensuring cottage continuity.
Know what your kids want You know that cottage ownership is a big personal and financial responsibility that is not for everyone. Discuss this with your children and if any of them are not interested in inheriting the cottage, avoid family squabbles by making sure they are treated fairly in your will.
If you decide on shared ownership, keep in mind that it can be a difficult proposition. That’s why it can be useful to obtain legal advice when you put an agreement in place – about such things as who uses the cottage and when, who pays for repairs, maintenance and upkeep, and the other nitty-gritty aspects of joint cottage ownership – to avoid protracted disputes and misunderstandings.
Manage the tax burden If your cottage has appreciated in value, your estate can face a significant capital gains liability that could force its sale by your heirs.
Capital gains taxes are based on the difference between the cost of your property and its current fair market value at the time of your death. The cost of your cottage is what you initially paid for it plus the value of any capital improvements you made to it over the years – a new deck or roof, for example, including the cost of anyone you hired to do the work for you – so keep your receipts to account for all these costs to help offset capital gains. General upkeep costs such as painting the cottage are generally not considered capital improvements.
Consider taking advantage of the primary residence exemption. You are allowed to name a primary residence that is exempt from tax on capital gain. The residence must be a property you ‘ordinarily inhabited’. It can be either your city home or your cottage. You are allowed just one principal residence at a time but you can choose to exempt the property with the bigger gain.
Have a succession plan Include an effective strategy for passing on your cottage. One option is to purchase life insurance with tax-free death benefits that will cover the capital gains on your cottage and/or other expenses and avoid the forced sale of estate assets. Life insurance is also a good way to equalize an estate where one child wants to keep the cottage, whereas other children would prefer to sell it and divide the proceeds of sale.
Some of these estate planning options may not work in your situation, so it’s a good idea to talk to your professional advisor about your wishes for your cottage and the financial and estate planning options that will work best for you.
John Scholl B. Mathematics, CGA,
Consultant - Investors Group Financial Services Inc.
Wealth Management & Financial Planning
Phone: (905) 450-2891 Toll Free: 1 (866) 799-2223 Cell (416) 731-3660
More for Lake Shore and Marine Parade - Humber Bay Shore
Etobicoke York Community Council (EYCC) green-lighted two condominum towers down on the lakeshore last week.
The first is a 39-storey condo to be built at 2123 Lake Shore Boulevard West and the second, a 30-storey condo at 68 Marine Parade Drive.
Both sites were initially proposed to have two, albeit shorter, towers on-site, but through community consultations, both proposals were amended and the second towers eliminated.
As part of the approval, city staff negotiated a number of Section 37 benefits, including:
- $480,000 toward park improvements south of Marine Parade Drive;
- $250,000 towards the improvement of and further acquisition requirements of Amos Waites Park and recreation facility;
- $500,000 towards a proposed outdoor ice skating oval at Colonel Samuel Smith Park Drive;
- $50,000 towards improvements to Mimico Memorial Park;
- $45,000 towards the restoration of Mimico Station;
- $45,000 towards Mimico BIA public art.
The project was approved by EYCC on Sept. 15 and the proposal will now go before Toronto City Council for final approval. .
Saturday, September 19, 2009
We need place to live
David looked after the financing; getting us a mortgage, finding a lawyer and collecting the status documents and a floorplan. This was the third unit we were bidding on as everytime it was a multiple offer. David kept telling us not to get upset, we would find a unit without going over our budget and we stayed within our means.
Our unit will be one of the condo's in the background with the extended balconies on the fifth floor. The Living Room and the Master bedroom both have a balcony that is joined.
Friday, September 18, 2009
Toronto real estate update Mid 0909
Your comments and views are always invited.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
The Little Engine that could!
We are moving further into a Seller's Market with interest rates hovering at near 4% fixed at five years. This does not bode well for buyer's as anything coming up for sale is immediately pushed into multiple offer territory. If you are considering listing I would like to speak with you. What will happen going into the fall?
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Toronto Condominium Taxation
Condominiums, even though they have been around for quite sometime in
This growth has lead many urban municipalities to allocate an ever increasingly larger proportion of larger building permits to condominium development. Since condominium developments, specifically high-rise condominiums, utilize less land area, they have also become an excellent planning tool for the urban municipality, enabling them to accommodate more people in a smaller land area. Although this growth in condominium developments has increased, almost exponentially in recent times, one aspect of condominium life has not changed, namely assessment on condos for the purpose of municipal taxes.
EACH CONDOMINUM UNIT IS STILL ASSESSED AS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNIT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE MUNICIPAL TAX BILL. This is the case because the assessment act of
David Pylyp; With the number of Toronto Condos nearing 50% maybe this idea is indeed timely. Please feel free to add your comments.
Westwood Theatre Courthouse Update
Plans proceed for provincial courthouse on Westwood lands
Proposal to go before city council next month
While the province continues to negotiate the purchase of a long vacant 4.3-acre parcel of city-owned property on the Westwood Theatre Lands, city staff have been simultaneously processing a rezoning application to make way for a new west-end courthouse on the site.
The proposal, billed as phase 1 of an extensive plan to revitalize the "barren, vacant land" at Westwood, was presented to the community Thursday, Sept. 10 - a full month before it's set to go before Etobicoke York Community Council (EYCC) on Oct. 13, and a month and a half before Toronto City Council will render its final decision on the proposal on Oct. 26.
"This is the first project to come up, so it's very important for us to get it right," said Etobicoke-Lakeshore Councillor Peter Milczyn, whose Ward 5 the property falls within.
Milczyn said the rezoning hold-up for the site is both technical and substantive.
"Technically, the Etobicoke Centre Secondary Plan calls for mixed use development of the area - both residential and office use - but courthouses are not mentioned within that wording. In fact, no zoning in any part of the city mentions courthouse uses in their zoning," he told a near capacity crowd in EYCC council chambers on Thursday night.
According to Brian Gallaugher, a senior city planner, the rezoning of the proposed courthouse parcel is further complicated by a Westwood-Theatre-land-wide holding provision written into the zoning bylaw.
"That means that even if a developer wished to build something that was fully permitted under the current zoning, council would still need assurance by way of an iron-clad agreement that the infrastructure - the roads, sewers, water mains - were all in place before that building would be allowed to open its doors," he said.
Back in April when Attorney General Chris Bentley first announced his intentions to locate the 20-courtroom Ontario Court of Justice on the site (right on the subway line at the intersections of Bloor and Dundas streets west and Kipling Avenue), Milczyn lauded the project as the "just the beginning of new roads, streetscapes and parks...as well as other community development in the area."
He echoed that sentiment again Thursday night: "This is just one part of a larger vision for the area; we're not only looking at this single parcel, we're looking at the Westwood Theatre lands as a whole. People have expressed concern that the city was just going to sell it off to condo developers and be done with it, but that's not my vision."
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Property Information Statements SPIS
The form is published by the Ontario Real Estate Association (OREA).
An increasing tide of court cases from across the country is evidence that the forms provide an endless source of income for litigation lawyers, and a bottomless pit of grief and expense to the parties involved in the transaction.
An Ontario Superior Court decision released earlier this year is yet another example of how dangerous these forms are and why OREA and some of its member boards should bear the blame for promoting them.
Back in 2002, Maria Lunney purchased a 90-year old Ottawa duplex for $180,000 from Jana Kuntova. The listing agent was Masoud Badre, an employee of Re/Max Metro City. The house was described in the sale listing as having a "stone, stucco" exterior with a "stone" foundation.
This type of foundation, with parging on the interior sides, was in common use until about 70 years ago, and is also known as a rubble foundation.
At the time of the listing, Kuntova – with the assistance of her agent, Badre – completed a Sellers Property Information Statement on the OREA form.
In it she stated that she was not aware of any structural problems in the basement.
Prior to the sale to Lunney, however, Kuntova had accepted an offer to purchase the property from Marque Laflamme. That purchaser had obtained a home inspection report, which indicated advanced crumbling of the rubble foundation under the rear extension of the house. Laflamme backed out of the transaction, although the seller was not told the reason for the cancellation.
At the time of her purchase in 2002, Lunney also commissioned a home inspection, but it did not reveal any defects in the foundation as the interior basement walls had been covered with drywall since the previous inspection.
A subsequent inspection undertaken for Lunney in 2005 revealed that there were serious foundation deficiencies behind the drywall, and that the property would either have to be demolished or raised to permit the construction of a new foundation under it.
The following year, Lunney sued Kuntova, Badre and Re/Max Metro-City for $300,000 in damages for misrepresentation. The co-defendants also sued each other.
The trial took place late last year over the course of five days. As a general guideline, the three lawyers involved probably spent at least another five days each in pre-trial discoveries and in preparation for trial. That comes to a total of a minimum of 30 lawyer-days, and points to a combined legal bill for everyone of something north of $100,000.
In the end, the judge found no evidence that the defendants were aware that the foundation was useless. The judge dismissed the case. Following the trial, Lunney paid court costs to the defendants, but the amounts have not been made public. As well, the losing plaintiff was responsible for her own legal bills and the foundation is still at the end of its useful life.
But for the existence of the SPIS this case may never have gone to court. The form is an invitation to litigation, and in my view agents who promote it are doing themselves and their clients a huge disservice by exposing everyone to needless litigation.
Bob McLean, director of communications at OREA, the publisher and promoter of the SPIS disclosure form, emailed me last week to say that the association had declined my request to interview a spokesperson but would shortly be providing me with a written statement about its position on the SPIS.
Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer. He can be reached by email at bob@aaron.ca, phone 416-364-9366 or fax 416-364-3818. Visit the column archives at http://aaron.ca/columns/toronto-star-index.htm for articles on this and other topics.
Friday, September 11, 2009
Condominium Corporations budgeting for the Harmonized Sales Tax
A challenging process that can’t be lightly undertaken!
By:
On July 1, 2010,
For the average person living in
However, one must realize that the PST in not collected on everything that GST is collected on. The catch phrase is “services”. PST is not currently collected on services, but under the proposed budget changes, services will now cost an additional 8%. Some of the items that will be affected by this change, just to mention a few, include utility bills (gas and hydro), internet, cable, and professional fees such as lawyers and accountants. Thus, on July 1, 2010, certain items will cost a whole 8% more than what you paid for them the day before. Unfortunately, you cannot stock up on utilities! This is a huge increase in times of an economic slowdown when consumers are cutting back.
Impact on condominium corporations and fees
Under the current system and as mentioned above, gas, hydro, professional fees, management fees and most repairs and maintenance services (e.g. cleaning, landscaping, snow removal, furnace and air conditioning maintenance, etc.) are not charged PST in a condominium corporation. Thus, the HST will result in an increase of 8% to these expenses. Water expense should remain the same as it is a non-taxable item. In addition, insurance should not be affected as it is subject only to PST, which will continue, and will not be subject to HST. In terms of repairs and maintenance, it is important to note that the HST applies to the total invoice amount including material and labour, while PST applies only to the material component.
Budgeting for the Harmonized Sales Tax 09 (2)
David Pylyp; Groups are forming to fight and petition against this tax grab. There will be a major impact to all those condo owners that are on a fixed income and will have a resultant increase in their maintenence fees due to the taxes, exclusive of any normal utility and expenses paid 2009 / 2010. When is it enough?
Thursday, September 10, 2009
The High 5's of Credit
Chris Molder from Tridac Mortgages points out that in many countries other than Canada it is difficult to obtain a mortgage on a purchase with less than 50 or 60% of the purchase price as the down payment.
Monday, September 7, 2009
Buyers, check condo status certificates carefully
In the course of my real estate law practice in Toronto, I often review condominium status certificates for purchasers. Usually this is a fairly routine function, where the lawyer looks for arrears in common expense payments, underfunded reserve funds, litigation by or against the condominium corporation, special assessments and similar items which could impact on the purchaser or her bank account.
Unfortunately, the contents of about four or five out of every 10 status certificates I examine are at odds with the advertised real estate listing, the agreement of purchase and sale or the seller's registered title.
The areas where the certificates differ from the other documents fall under several headings:
Common expenses
More than half of the status certificates I review show common expenses, which disagree with the advertised figures. This is often caused by sellers who advise their listing agents of the wrong amounts, and by real estate agents who fail to verify the numbers with property managers.
Sometimes, when a real estate listing runs through the condominium corporation's year-end, and the common expenses are increased, the listings are not updated with the new figures.
When the discrepancy is revealed, there is often a tug-of-war as to who will absorb the difference, which may be just a few dollars a month, or occasionally, as much as $50 or $100.
Special assessments
The same thing happens with special assessments. In Ontario, the standard form Ontario Real Estate Association (OREA) condominium agreement of purchase and sale contains a warranty that there are no special assessments contemplated by the condominium corporation.
Unfortunately, with the aging condominium stock in Ontario, special assessments are becoming increasingly commonplace.
The problem is that a unit owner may not know that a special assessment is under consideration by the board at the time an offer is accepted.
In cases like this, the seller or the real estate agent often winds up eating the cost.
Parking and locker mix-ups
For some unexplained reasons, many Ontario condominiums have numbers posted on parking and locker units which differ from the numbers on the registered deeds.
For example, a parking or locker space with a painted number 99 may be shown on the registered title as unit 53 level A.
Unit mix-ups: the ultimate headache
Every so often I come across buildings where two or more owners are actually living in units they don't own. This usually happens at the time of title transfer from the developer to the first owners, and is not discovered for years.
Nobody wants to have a deed to the unit next door. It becomes very difficult to sell your condominium, when the time comes, if you don't have a deed to it.
This actually happened on closing day in 2005 for 124 units in a downtown Toronto highrise on Jarvis St., but was corrected at the very last second.
The moral of the story: Never purchase a condominium unit – new or used – without cross-checking the unit numbers on the deeds with the floor plans. A few dollars invested in the floor plans are cheap protection to avoid a disaster.
Several lessons emerge from all of this:
- Sellers and listing agents should be careful to advertise the correct common expenses and to amend them during the listing period if a new budget is passed.
- Unit and level numbers for parking and locker spaces can and do get mixed up. Posted numbers don't always match the deeds. Sellers, buyers and agents should take care to verify unit numbers and location at the time the offer is signed.
- When special assessments are being contemplated, they should be disclosed to owners at the earliest opportunity, and sellers should disclose this to their listing agents. Sellers should also check with the condominium board or management to see if any assessments are being considered.
- Deeded numbers for condo units should always be compared with the registered survey plans for the condominium levels. They're not always right.
Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer. He can be reached by email at bob@aaron.ca, phone 416-364-9366 or fax 416-364-3818. Visit the column archives at http://aaron.ca/columns/toronto-star-index.htm for articles on this and other topics.
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Adding Value to your experience
Scribed
There are a number of variables here.
Interest Rate is calculated by the posted rate weekly, Land Transfer Taxes are variable based on where you purchase. Land Transfer Calculation Link Do you qualify for a Land Transfer Tax exemption or rebate I usually take from here. I can prepare one for you rather easily on my laptop and send it along as an email. We will, during the course of our shopping adventure look at a number of these to clearly understand out monthly long term commitments.
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Artificial Interest Rates are the crack Cocaine of Real Estate
One of the best quotes I've seen this year: "... artificially low interest rates are the crack cocaine driving the real estate market." (Garth Turner).
The Real Estate "Spring" Market came late this year but it did arrive and sales are on pace to match last year.
The "Spring" Market for 2010 is facing a One Two Punch - a probable rise in the Bank of Canada Borrowing Rate in April and, the introduction of the Harmonized Sales Tax in July. These two factors will dramatically lessen affordability which seems likely to drive down both prices and sales.
This means that the next 6 to 9 months may be both the best time to buy and the best time to sell.
For many buyers it's all about affordability and it hasn't been this good in a long, long time.
For sellers looking to capture the capital value of their homes (downsizers, whether by choice or circumstance) this is likely about as good as it's going to get ... prices have risen for 13 years in a row. And you can make a case that the peak in 2009 may be very much like the peak in 1989 when prices fell for the next 7 years and didn't return to 1989 levels for almost 13 years.
I work with a number of realtors in helping their downsizing clients achieve their goals with respect to retirement income and I'd like to share some of what I've learned.
I am pleased to invite you to attend my upcoming seminar - Downsizing: The Next Wave in Real Estate
In this seminar I will review the latest stats on sales levels and pricing for the GTA Real Estate market and discuss where I think the market is heading next year
I will also present several case studies to illustrate how downsizers may best achieve their financial goals by acting now. For example, at age 55 Carol downsized and 10 years later she had grown her initial $200,000 to more than $315,000 but, even more important, she had secured lifetime income of more than $22,000 per year ... with income tax at a rate of less than 5%.
With more people than ever looking to downsize it’s never been more important for realtors to be able to offer them options which may help them optimize their income needs. The benefits are numerous: clients achieve their goals; clients feel more comfortable in setting a realistic market price; clients tell their friends and family how well their downsizing move worked for them.
Isn't it worth 90 minutes of your time to learn about an option which may help you become one of the realtors of choice for the fastest growing market segment?
10:00am Friday September 11th
Homewood Suites by Hilton, Oakville
RSVP to David Pylyp at 647 218 2414 or email david@davidpylyp.com
I look forward to meeting you.
Best regards,
Warren J. Huntley
Retirement Income Specialist
Braley Winton Financial Group
Office: 905.815.1035
Cellular: 416.500.4064
Toll Free: 877.372.9022