We may qualify at the posted rates and take a mortgage at the variable rates; additional expenses make it harder to save for retirement or that annual vacation.
Who says so? CD Howe Institute. December of 2015
The portion of mortgage indebted households with a primary mortgage debt-to-disposable income ratio in excess of 500 percent has climbed from 3 percent in 1999 to 11 percent in 2012.December 9, 2015 – The federal government should pay close attention to several pockets of risk in the Canadian housing market, according to a new C.D. Howe Institute report. In “Mortgaged to the Hilt: Risks From The Distribution of Household Mortgage Debt,” authors Craig Alexander and Paul Jacobson expose pockets of vulnerability by going beyond national averages and focusing on the distribution of house mortgage debt by income, age and region, all of which matter most when assessing risk.
“Household mortgage debt has risen dramatically and traditional economy-wide averages understate the degree of financial risk for those that carried mortgages because they typically divide the value of mortgages across the income of households with and without mortgages”, remarks Alexander.
Using the data from the Survey of Financial Security, the authors find that the ratio of the value of mortgages on primary dwellings have jumped from 144 percent of after-tax income in 1999 to 204 percent in 2012. However, this also understates the degree of financial risk for a significant minority of households.
The author’s analysis suggests that a significant minority of Canadians having taken on a high degree of financial risk. The portion of mortgage indebted households with a primary mortgage debt-to-disposable income ratio in excess of 500 percent has climbed from 3 percent in 1999 to 11 percent in 2012. Their analysis of the distribution of mortgage debt is as follows:
- Income: The increase in highly mortgage-indebted households has been in all income groups, but more so in lower-income quintiles.
- Age: The increase in financial risk is also evident across all age groups, but more so for younger Canadians who have entered the market most recently.
Additionally, the authors find that roughly 1-in-5 of mortgage indebted households have less than $5,000 in financial assets to draw upon in response to a loss of income or to higher debt service costs. 1-in-10 mortgage-indebted households have less than $1,500 in financial assets to address any shock. This represents an inadequate financial buffer, as average mortgage payments are more than $1,000 a month, before taxes and operating costs.
- Region: As one might expect, there has been greater concentration of mortgage debt in the provinces with the strongest housing booms.
The federal government may want to consider further policy actions to lean against the shift towards significantly higher mortgage burdens. However, such policy measures should not be unduly heavy handed and should be targeted to address the distributional nature of the risks.
For example, potential targeted measures would be to tighten underwriting requirements by lifting required credit scores, capping total debt-service ratios at lower levels, lifting qualifying interest rates when doing income testing, or varying the minimum downpayment by the size of mortgage to target higher-priced markets. Such measures would build on the regulatory tightening already done to date without posing a material threat to Canadian real estate markets. https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary_441_0.pdf Click here for the full report.
Getting the correct Mortgage Advice; living with your means and eliminating HIGH Interest rate credit card debt all count towards securing your long term comfort. I recommend a debt check up with http://RenewyourMortgage.ca
Because the best mortgage is NO mortgage at all.
David Pylyp
TXT 647 218 2414 or Email
Morgan Stanley Just Walks Away From Five San Fran Office Towers
http://www.businessinsider.com/morgan-stanley-just-walks-away-from-five-san-fran-office-towers-2009-12
Cold Cost/Benefit analysis is the ethic we have chosen.
Steve Waldman at Interfluidity has a post on this issue:
http://www.interfluidity.com/v2/364.html
"Businesses walk away from contracts all the time, whenever the benefits of doing so exceed the costs under the terms by which they are bound."
"Individuals must operate in a competitive economic environment dominated by entities constitutionally incapable of overriding self-interest to “do the right thing”. Virtuous individuals can expect no reciprocity from the firms with which they contract. They have two choices: live nobly and get screwed, or adopt the amoral norms of their counterparties. It has taken some time, but we are all coming around to the only supportable view. “It’s just business,” we shrug, even if we never wanted to be businessmen."
David Pylyp; If I buy a home / house /condo and realise some years down the road that I am underwater (over financed) on my Investment or purchase I can merely [GIVE BACK] that asset and walk away from any other financial consequences and personal obligation in Canada.
UMMM... No [They] liquidate all the assets of the borrower to repay all the debts starting with local and municipal taxes, condo management maintenance fees then interest arrears and they will chase you for the balance.
The US markets just paid a horrific price for bailouts and other "LEADER" is continuing in exactly the same vein. Did we miss a lesson?
This sets an incredible example for our children and future generations in that; at any point in time if they do not like the result of their choices, yes choices! they can walk away with impunity. Life without consequences. Is anyone responsible for anything?
What do yo think?