Toronto real estate facts and News, from Humber Bay Shore Condos, West Toronto, Etobicoke, Mississauga and Oakville. Neighbourhood Profiles, News Items, Information on Real Estate Trends, Market Statistics, Buying; Selling Tips and Commentary
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Have you been priced out of Toronto Real Estate?
Think you missed the market? Are you concerned about prices?
If we are patient and methodical in our search and look thru everything that may be suitable; in your desired neighbourhood, we will find it.
Don't get caught up in the competition and drama of staged, perfumed houses with lipstick and fresh paint.
Consider your absolute must haves in your property purchase.
How close to the public school? Transit Needs? Shopping or other amenities. Is it community and neighbourhood you crave?
Houses are like waiting for a bus... Another one will be along shortly.
Sometimes waiting is hard, but the success and joy of finding that perfect property is unmatched.
We have been helping families for 25 years in west Toronto. If you would like to talk to me you can call 416 233 9000 or my cell at 647 218 2414.
Lets find something perfect for you.
PS; VOW [Virtual Office Website] to released shortly... Call for details
https://plus.google.com/u/0/109283965469179719942
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Dear For Sale By Owner
Selling is a profession. It's hard work. Ultimately, it's rewarding, because the thing you're selling delivers real value to the purchaser, and your job is to counsel them so they can get the benefit. http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2011/05/selling-vs-inviting.html
Saturday, March 27, 2010
HST will catch people sleeping July 1st
The HST will inevitably hurt small business as people react by closing their wallets. It will further drive the underground economy by making the cash option a minimum of 15% - 20% less since you didn't pay it, they won't declare it. Cash registers don't have that option.
Monday, March 22, 2010
Developer-imposed purchase agreements challenged
It has become common practice in Toronto for some developers to require condominium purchasers in each building to contribute to the costs of guest suites, superintendent’s units, carwash bays, car share units and similar amenities.
Typically, the total price for these units is between $250,000 and $500,000 per project, and the cost is amortized over 10 or 15 years with interest at 4 per cent above the 10-year Canada Bond rate.
Instead of the charges for these facilities being buried in the purchase price of each condominium unit, they are added to the monthly common expenses for a decade or more after closing. As a result, over a period of years, each condominium buyer can expect to pay a total of perhaps $1,000 to $1,500 in addition to the purchase price. The cost varies with the price of the units and the applicable interest rate.
Although the added charges are set out in the small print of the condominium disclosure statements, they are not referred to in the purchase agreements, and in my experience, never mentioned in sales offices.
This practice may soon end in the wake of a decision of Justice Julie A. Thorburn last year, in a case involving condominium developer Lexington on the Green Inc., and the unit owners of Toronto Standard Condominium Corp. 1930.
Lexington on the Green is a project on Lawrence Ave. W., in the Weston Village area. The registered condominium declaration required the condominium corporation (consisting of the new unit owners) to purchase from the developer a management unit, plus one parking space and a locker for $240,000.
This purchase obligation was also set out in the disclosure statement given to each buyer.
Acting under this requirement in May 2008, the developer-controlled board of directors passed a bylaw requiring the condominium corporation to buy the units, and the board signed a purchase and sale agreement with the developer.
Seven months later, a “turnover” meeting was held, and the new owners elected a board of directors to replace the developer’s board.
In March of last year, the new board passed a resolution to terminate the purchase and sale agreement and end its obligation to buy the management unit. When the developer was notified, it applied to the Superior Court to determine whether the purchase agreement was binding.
Section 112 of the Condominium Act states that a condominium board may terminate an agreement “for the provision of facilities to the corporation on other than a non-profit basis” if the agreement was entered into before the turnover meeting and the election of the new board.
The Act also says that if any provision in a condominium declaration is inconsistent with the legislation, the Act prevails and the declaration is deemed to be amended accordingly.
Justice Thorburn heard the arguments of both sides and dismissed the developer’s application. She ruled that the unit owners did not have to buy the resident manager’s unit.
The judge concluded that the Ontario legislature intended to allow a board of directors to terminate an agreement for the provision of facilities or units in cases like this one if the termination is made within 12 months of the turnover meeting to the new board.
The parties were back in court in December. They agreed on an order to amend the condominium declaration to delete parts of the declaration requiring the corporation to buy the management unit, and to allow the unit owners to use the suite for the purposes permitted by the legislation. The unit owners were awarded costs of $7,250.
Thousands of condominium units are now under construction in the GTA, and the disclosure statements in a great many of them contain similar requirements to buy various units with payments spread out over many years.
Based on the Lexington on the Green case, it can be expected that incoming condominium boards across the GTA, and those elected within the past year, will be terminating these developer-imposed purchase requirements.
The cost savings to unit owners will be in the millions of dollars.
Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer. He can be reached by email at bob@aaron.ca, phone 416-364-9366 or fax 416-364-3818. Visit the column archives at http://aaron.ca/columns/toronto-star-index.htm for articles on this and other topics.
Saturday, March 6, 2010
Hey Ontario what Are you doing w/ HST?

Prince George – Former BC Premier, Bill Vander Zalm, is bringing his grass roots organization Fight HST to Northern BC to raise awareness for the Citizen Initiative petition he has launched, set to begin on April 6, 2010. What is covered by HST
The colorful former premier, who governed BC under the Social Credit banner from 1986 – 1991, has been approved by Elections BC to conduct a legally binding Citizen Initiative petition to repeal the HST. The petition requires the signatures of 10% of registered voters in all 85 electoral districts in BC. Vander Zalm is touring the North from March 12 – 17th to raise awareness and to sign up volunteers to canvass in their districts.
“So many people and businesses have told us they will do anything they can to stop this cruel tax. We have signed up over 2,000 volunteers so far, but we’d like to double that number to assure success,” Vander Zalm explained.
“By getting all British Columbians to work together, we can stop the government from proceeding with this tax.”
Vander Zalm says that in addition to the hundreds of small business people who have signed on, he now has several large business associations coming on board. He says many groups who had previously been trying to attack the problem independently are seeing that a united front is the strongest way to stop the HST.
“This petition is uniting British Columbians of every walk of life and every political stripe. We have business people, working people, professionals, teachers, unemployed, seniors, NDP, BC Conservatives, Independents, BC Refederation, and many former Liberal voters acting as organizers, canvassers and captains.”
Vander Zalm was responsible for putting the Initiative and Recall Act legislation on the ballot in 1991. The NDP later drafted the current legislation, making BC unique in Canada in having a method by which citizens can speak to issues and government between elections.
“We don’t have to accept a tax that the government has no mandate to bring in, and which will hurt people and families at a time when they can least afford it,” said Vander Zalm.